IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v49y2020i1p108-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Approach to Pretest Questionnaire: The Analysis of Respondents’ Comments in the Flexible Interview

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Palmieri

Abstract

The researcher, who pretests a questionnaire conventionally, is confident that a small number of interviews reveals numerous problems afflict the questionnaire. The standardized interviewer is asked to observe respondent’s verbal behaviors in order to realize whether respondent misunderstands question. But this strategy fails when respondent does not show any misunderstanding signal. The study, reported in this article, illustrates how to exceed this limit, by means of the analysis of respondent’s comments released in the flexible interview, which researcher uses to unveil incongruities between question and answer; the questions, when many respondents’ misunderstandings occur, should be reworded. This study shows that the number of problems and the number of the problematic questions identified by this unconventional procedure are much higher than the number of problems and the number of problematic questions determined by the conventional pretesting. The strength of respondents’ comments analysis is to discover problems the questionnaire poses for respondents, even when the respondents do not give any misunderstanding signal.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Palmieri, 2020. "An Innovative Approach to Pretest Questionnaire: The Analysis of Respondents’ Comments in the Flexible Interview," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 108-132, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:49:y:2020:i:1:p:108-132
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124117729699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124117729699
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124117729699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:49:y:2020:i:1:p:108-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.