IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v20y1992i3p340-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response Effects in a Network Survey

Author

Listed:
  • RONALD F. CZAJA

    (North Carolina State University)

  • DEBORAH H. TRUNZO

    (National Center for Health Statistics)

  • PATRICIA N. ROYSTON

    (Health Resources and Services Administration)

Abstract

A reverse record check study was conducted to measure the response effects in a network survey designed to locate a rare population subgroup. In this field experiment, diagnosed cancer patients and certain specified relatives were interviewed using a survey instrument based on the National Health Interview Survey questionnaire and a supplemental set of questions designed to identify persons with cancer. The measurement errors associated with obtaining reports on cancer diagnosis and the date of diagnosis are presented. In general, high rates of patient identification were found in both patient and relative households; in only 6% of the patient-relative pairs was the patient not reported. Females and Whites were more likely to be reported than males and non-Whites. A significant amount of variation and error in reporting date of diagnosis was found for both the patient and the relative households. Contrary to expectations, most households were likely to backward rather than to forward telescope the date of diagnosis. Suggestions on how to deal with error due to memory factors are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald F. Czaja & Deborah H. Trunzo & Patricia N. Royston, 1992. "Response Effects in a Network Survey," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 340-366, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:20:y:1992:i:3:p:340-366
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124192020003004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124192020003004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124192020003004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:20:y:1992:i:3:p:340-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.