IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v11y1983i4p443-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods of Presenting Scientific Evidence in Court

Author

Listed:
  • MARK A. CHESLER

    (University of Michigan)

  • DEBRA S. KALMUSS

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • JOSEPH SANDERS

    (University of Houston)

Abstract

This article presents and analyzes lawyers' and scientists' views of the advisability of using alternatives to the party witness format (e.g., scientific panels) in school desegregation cases. Scientists' and attorneys' desires to control the presentation of evidence and courtroom interaction is one factor explaining their preference for panels or party witness formats. In addition, control is seen as a means of influencing several other issues: selection of an appropriate form of dispute settlement in this litigation; management of potential bias in social science scholarship and testimony; and determination of the proper role of expert witnesses. These issues are investigated with a sample of lawyers and scholars who tried and testified in 17 school desegregation cases across the nation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark A. Chesler & Debra S. Kalmuss & Joseph Sanders, 1983. "Methods of Presenting Scientific Evidence in Court," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 11(4), pages 443-468, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1983:i:4:p:443-468
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124183011004004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124183011004004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124183011004004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1983:i:4:p:443-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.