IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v9y2004i1p65-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘A UK Sociolinguistic Perspective: Gene, Jeffrey and Evangelical ‘Broad Inclusion’ Intersubjectivity’

Author

Listed:
  • Noel Heather

Abstract

Critical sociolinguistics (conceived as Critical Discourse Analysis: CDA), which has a focus on inclusive and exclusive language within social practice, can be used to shed light on underlying aspects of recent debates about the appointment of homosexual bishops in the UK and USA. One strand of the CDA approach is to examine the social cognitions implicit in the behaviours of communities. In the case of the religious communities involved here, a basic feature of their differences lies in their use of contrasting socio-theological, mentally-encoded schemata: the Evangelical, group-focused, strong commitment frame (SCF) contrasts sharply with the more liberally-inclined, more ‘individual-respecting’, social normalcy frame (SNF). One of the consequences of this is that Evangelicals appear to enjoy a particularly strong sense of ‘mental bonding of outlook’, intersubjectivity, in which a high focus on group objectives and social outlooks is closely allied to their traditional beliefs. And although Evangelical, ‘group- thought’ intersubjectivity may aid mental resistance to change on some social issues (eg homosexual bishops), it may however also help maintain ‘broad inclusion’ in terms of social marginalisation of normally more common, but perhaps less ‘culturally visible’ kinds (eg the single and elderly).

Suggested Citation

  • Noel Heather, 2004. "‘A UK Sociolinguistic Perspective: Gene, Jeffrey and Evangelical ‘Broad Inclusion’ Intersubjectivity’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(1), pages 65-67, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:9:y:2004:i:1:p:65-67
    DOI: 10.1177/136078040400900108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/136078040400900108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/136078040400900108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:9:y:2004:i:1:p:65-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.