IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v7y2002i2p68-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘For Better or Worse?’: Heterosexuality Reinvented

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Hockey
  • Victoria Robinson
  • Angela Meah

Abstract

Based upon a series of focus group discussions carried out in East Yorkshire, this article contributes to debates on both the nature and theorising of heterosexual relationships that have recently been investigated from diverse perspectives. These group discussions represent the launch of the first major empirical study of heterosexuality and ageing that has been undertaken in the UK. In drawing upon preliminary data from these focus groups, our findings reinforce and add to the challenging of a representation of heterosexuality which is both monolithic and inflexible, by exploring accounts of peoples’ actual lived experiences. Through this research we begin to generate a theoretical approach which highlights the complexity of these lived realities. We particularly explore the intersections of gender, age, class and family location. In doing so, we pinpoint differences, contradictions, but also continuities, in the ways in which people discuss and comment on their own and other people's perceptions and experiences of heterosexuality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Hockey & Victoria Robinson & Angela Meah, 2002. "‘For Better or Worse?’: Heterosexuality Reinvented," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(2), pages 68-79, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:7:y:2002:i:2:p:68-79
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:7:y:2002:i:2:p:68-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.