IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v31y2026i2p364-372.html

Negotiating Critical Tensions: Creating an Online Resource on Vaccine Hesitancy for Healthcare Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Tristan Emerson

    (University of Nottingham, UK)

  • Pru Hobson-West

    (University of Nottingham, UK)

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is regarded as a priority for public health and has a long history of social science research. As part of a qualitative project on childhood vaccine hesitancy, a team of social scientists translated their empirical findings into an online resource (known as a reusable learning object – RLO) aimed at healthcare professionals. The aim of this article is to identify the primary tensions we experienced in creating the RLO. As social scientists, first we were torn by clinicians’ requests for instruction/answers, versus our preference of providing opportunities for reflection. Second, between the RLO-specific convention of assertion versus our professional norms of providing evidence via referencing; and finally, by our tendency as academics to focus on textual aspects, versus the need to consider visual and multimedia conventions within the design of the RLO. By sharing these reflections, we hope to help other sociologists to navigate their own creative interdisciplinary projects and conclude by observing that our processes were themselves inherently reflexive.

Suggested Citation

  • Tristan Emerson & Pru Hobson-West, 2026. "Negotiating Critical Tensions: Creating an Online Resource on Vaccine Hesitancy for Healthcare Professionals," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 31(2), pages 364-372, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:364-372
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804251351131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804251351131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804251351131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:364-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.