IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v31y2026i2p331-341.html

A Methodology for the Study of Affective Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Chloe Alexander

Abstract

While interest in the study of affects grows, there is a need for methodologies that generate new analytical perspectives on subjects such as the connection between affects and policies. Reviewing the interconnections between the literature on affect and policy, I argue that methodological developments through visual ethnography can draw them closer together. I report the methods and analysis from a visual ethnographic study that sheds light on under-recognised affective characteristics of policies. This challenges the traditional exclusion of emotions and affect from the study of policy. It calls attention to the potential within drawing methods and their particular strengths for the study of affective policies and the promotion of embodied reflective qualitative methods. Methodologies that attend to affective policies can become an important resource to better understand the way that policies operate and to increase scrutiny of the impact on people’s lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Chloe Alexander, 2026. "A Methodology for the Study of Affective Policies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 31(2), pages 331-341, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:331-341
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804251341863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804251341863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804251341863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lexie Scherer, 2016. "Children's Engagements with Visual Methods through Qualitative Research in the Primary School as ‘Art that Didn't Work’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Rose Wiles & Amanda Coffey & Judy Robison & Jon Prosser, 2012. "Ethical Regulation and Visual Methods: Making Visual Research Impossible or Developing Good Practice?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(1), pages 3-12, February.
    3. Alexandra Allan, 2012. "Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(3), pages 256-266, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenting Yu & Bo Zhou & Jianjun Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Characteristics of Older Adults in Community Public Spaces: Gender and Aging in Dalian, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    2. Jon Dean, 2015. "Drawing What Homelessness Looks Like: Using Creative Visual Methods as a Tool of Critical Pedagogy," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Graham Crow, 2024. "‘Amusing and Fun’, ‘Arresting’, or ‘The Wrong Pictures’? Methodological Lessons from Using Photo-Elicitation in a Study of Academic Retirement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 3-22, March.
    4. Magali Peyrefitte, 2012. "Ways of Seeing, Ways of Being and Ways of Knowing in the Inner-City: Exploring Sense of Place through Visual Tours," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(4), pages 125-141, November.
    5. Jessica Abrahams & Nicola Ingram, 2013. "The Chameleon Habitus: Exploring Local Students’ Negotiations of Multiple Fields," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 213-226, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:331-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.