IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v31y2026i2p315-330.html

Relational Logics of Child Maintenance and Post-separation Economic Abuse in Minoritised British South Asian Muslim Post-divorce Families

Author

Listed:
  • Kaveri Qureshi

    (The University of Edinburgh, UK)

  • Punita Chowbey

    (Sheffield Hallam University, UK)

Abstract

This article furthers understandings of post-separation economic abuse in minoritised British South Asian Muslim post-divorce/separated families. We explore the relational logics of child maintenance payment and propensities to post-separation economic abuse which are especially egregious for British South Asian Muslim women due interlinked factors: economic marginalisation, feminised poverty, gendered asymmetries in domestic finance, socioculturally distinct forms of economic restrictions, legal non-recognition of certain abuses, structural and institutional racialisation precipitating financial exclusion, and harmful immigration rules. We highlight the potential for child maintenance payment to become a means for perpetuating economic abuse post-separation, the state agency’s support to norms of male financial discretion enabling abuse, as well as the necessity of the agency in checking economic exploitation where post-separation abuse remains inadequately addressed. We call for further intersectional research into the impact of recent legal developments in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaveri Qureshi & Punita Chowbey, 2026. "Relational Logics of Child Maintenance and Post-separation Economic Abuse in Minoritised British South Asian Muslim Post-divorce Families," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 31(2), pages 315-330, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:315-330
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804251366732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804251366732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804251366732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:315-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.