IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v30y2025i4p922-941.html

How ‘International’ Are Sociology Journals? Analysis of Stated Aims and Editorial Board Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Brown

    (University of Nottingham, UK)

  • Maria Antonieta Vega Castillo

    (University of Nottingham, UK)

  • Rita Hordósy

    (University of Nottingham, UK)

Abstract

This article analyses leading international sociology journals regarding the global relations as observed within their aims and editorial boards. As such, it explores the geographies and power relations of knowledge production in the context of sociology as a discipline. First, it analyses the aims of journals as outlined via their respective websites, focusing on whether and how any global or international focus appears. Second, it explores the current country affiliation of journal editorial boards to provide an overview of the broader scholarly community. Third, it looks at the network of gatekeepers, exploring editorial board interlocking. The results show a discipline dominated by the global centre, where editorial board interlocking heightens the agenda-setting power of a few academics affiliated predominantly in western contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Brown & Maria Antonieta Vega Castillo & Rita Hordósy, 2025. "How ‘International’ Are Sociology Journals? Analysis of Stated Aims and Editorial Board Networks," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(4), pages 922-941, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:922-941
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241281455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241281455
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241281455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles J. Gomez & Andrew C. Herman & Paolo Parigi, 2022. "Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 919-929, July.
    2. Lucinda Cash-Gibson & Diego F Rojas-Gualdrón & Juan M Pericàs & Joan Benach, 2018. "Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Charles Crothers, 2011. "Developments in British Sociology as Shown in British Sociology Journals," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(3), pages 202-211, August.
    4. Alesia Zuccala, 2006. "Modeling the invisible college," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(2), pages 152-168, January.
    5. Sarah Cummings & Paul Hoebink, 2017. "Representation of Academics from Developing Countries as Authors and Editorial Board Members in Scientific Journals: Does this Matter to the Field of Development Studies?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(2), pages 369-383, April.
    6. Dorte Henriksen, 2016. "The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 455-476, May.
    7. Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher & Tamara Heck & Kerstin Schoch, 2023. "Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 228-243.
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0221212 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Dyachenko & Iurii Agafonov & Katerina Guba & Alexander Gelvikh, 2024. "Independent Russian medical science: is there any?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5577-5597, September.
    2. Eduardo Kunzel Teixeira & Mirian Oliveira, 2018. "Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1853-1869, December.
    3. Daniel B. Metcalfe & Emily Anders & Hanna Axén & E. Petter Axelsson & April E. Bermudez & David C. Bartholomew & Nathalie Butt & Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz & Nitin Chaudhary & Timon Callebaut & Cecilia A. , 2025. "Gaps in tropical science from unrepresentative distribution of sampling and citation across natural terrestrial environments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Lissoni, Francesco, 2010. "Academic inventors as brokers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 843-857, September.
    5. M. Ausloos, 2013. "A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 895-909, June.
    6. Daoud, Adel & Kohl, Sebastian, 2016. "How much do sociologists write about economic topics? Using big data to test some conventional views in economic sociology, 1890 to 2014," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Arnauld Bessagnet & Joan Crespo & Jerome Vicente, 2023. "How is the literature on Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystems structured? A socio-semantic network approach," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2320, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2023.
    8. Ausloos, Marcel, 2015. "Coherent measures of the impact of co-authors in peer review journals and in proceedings publications," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 568-578.
    9. Zhe Cao & Lin Zhang & Ying Huang & Robin Haunschild, 2026. "How does the academia refer to open research information data sources? A review study based on OpenAlex and Microsoft Academic series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(2), pages 873-899, February.
    10. Cristian J. Moscoso & Fernando Ortega-Klose & Alejandra Acuña, 2021. "Are Chilean Pasture Seed End-Users Adopting New Species? Trends and Joinpoint Regression Analysis of the Last 19 Years of Seed Imports," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Fengyuan Liu & Petter Holme & Matteo Chiesa & Bedoor AlShebli & Talal Rahwan, 2023. "Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 353-364, March.
    12. Alfonso Ávila-Robinson & Kumiko Miyazaki, 2013. "Evolutionary paths of change of emerging nanotechnological innovation systems: the case of ZnO nanostructures," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 829-849, June.
    13. Matthias Aistleitner & Stephan Puehringer, 2023. "Biased Trade Narratives and Its Influence on Development Studies: A Multi-level Mixed-Method Approach," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(6), pages 1322-1346, December.
    14. Alesia Zuccala & Peter Besselaar, 2009. "Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 111-122, October.
    15. H. Kent Baker & Satish Kumar & Nitesh Pandey, 2020. "A bibliometric analysis of European Financial Managementʼs first 25 years," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1224-1260, November.
    16. Jordi Ardanuy & Llorenç Arguimbau & Ángel Borrego, 2022. "Social sciences and humanities research funded under the European Union Sixth Framework Programme (2002–2006): a long-term assessment of projects, acknowledgements and publications," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Sandra Miguel & Claudia M. González & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, 2024. "Towards a new approach to analyzing the geographical scope of national research. An exploratory analysis at the country level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 3659-3679, July.
    18. Aurora A. C. Teixeira & Luisa Mota, 2012. "A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university–industry links," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 719-743, December.
    19. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Farooq Rehan, 2020. "Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 591-627, November.
    20. Hassan Bougrine, 2014. "Subfield effects on the core of coauthors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1047-1064, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:922-941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.