IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v30y2025i3p673-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Satisfaction and Work–Life Balance: The Complexities of Gender Patterning

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Brooks

    (University of Oxford, UK)

  • Jun Fu

    (The University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Quentin Maire

    (The University of Melbourne, Australia)

Abstract

Conventionally, issues connected to work–life balance have been thought to concern women more than men – not least through the promotion of a strongly gendered discourse about the imperative to become a ‘balanced woman’. In this article, however, we draw on interview data from both men and women (in Australia, occupying broadly middle-class social positions) to show the complexities of gender patterning. Specifically, we demonstrate that the cultural imaginary of a ‘balanced life’ as route to life satisfaction was shared equally by the men and women in our sample. Moreover, men were as likely as women to point to the arrival of children as a key ‘fateful moment’ for re-evaluating their own work–life balance. However, gender disparities were evident in both the nature of change that was effected to achieve ‘balance’ and the associated expectations of partners. The article contributes to the gendered theorisation of work–life balance as a cultural norm in contemporary society.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Brooks & Jun Fu & Quentin Maire, 2025. "Life Satisfaction and Work–Life Balance: The Complexities of Gender Patterning," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(3), pages 673-690, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:3:p:673-690
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241284807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241284807
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241284807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:3:p:673-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.