IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v30y2025i2p452-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stimulating Political Imagination With Arts-Based Methods: The Case of Utopia Consultation

Author

Listed:
  • Inna Perheentupa

    (University of Turku, Finland)

  • Pilvi Porkola

    (University of the Arts Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

In this article, we identify ways to methodologically stimulate political imagination in sociological research by exploring an art concept called ‘utopia consultation’ and related arts-based exercises. We investigate how political imagination can be stimulated and practised through arts-based research methods in sociology, and what tangible tools arts-based research offers for studying the intangible. Our analysis builds on recent work on utopia, understood as a tool rather than a blueprint, and sociology of the future, which focuses on the future as an analytical category. We draw on 18 one-on-one utopia consultation sessions conducted in 3 upper secondary schools in Finland, and 3 facilitated collective discussions with the participants in each education institution to discuss their experiences of the one-on-one utopia consultations. Based on our analysis, we suggest four key methodological practices for stimulating political imagination: dialogue, play, cultivating a hopeful orientation to the not-yet, and collective utopian negotiation. We advance sociological discussions of methodology around utopia and political imagination, and contribute to sociological work on the intangibility of discovering the not-yet through arts-based methods by identifying tangible practices and tools for studying the intangible.

Suggested Citation

  • Inna Perheentupa & Pilvi Porkola, 2025. "Stimulating Political Imagination With Arts-Based Methods: The Case of Utopia Consultation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(2), pages 452-468, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:452-468
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241286416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241286416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241286416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:452-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.