IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v30y2025i2p434-451.html

Doing the Unspeakable: Material Participation in Reprod-estr-uctive Labour

Author

Listed:
  • Massilia Ourabah

    (UGent, Belgium)

Abstract

This article examines everyday labours of life-maintenance – cooking, cleaning, child-rearing – for what they tell us about participation in a moment of environmental devastation. Building on feminist theories of reproductive labour, I use the term reprod-estr-uctive labour to explore a contemporary tension: how to reproduce life in a dying world? What forms of participation is this tension producing? This article is based on qualitative work with French families and weaves together: (eco)feminist theories of reproductive labour and care work, ethics of care, (Feminist) Science and Technology Studies, theories of environmental and epistemic justice, (Rancièrian) critique of pedagogy, and ecological thinking. It argues that reprod-estr-uctive labour offers speechless participation for speechless times. Reprod-estr-uctive labour allows a space for material participation which is particularly worthy of attention in a moment where words seem to fail us. How can we possibly talk about it (climate changing, species dying, oceans rising)? In the impossibility of expressing concern , doing care remains. The article contextualises material participation in a logocentric political regime which predominantly situates participation in public-oriented discourse. Yet having no words for it does not mean not caring about/for it. This article argues that the environmental situation accentuates two problems with logocentric politics: first, it calls us to the materiality of our Earthly footing, which makes ever-more problematic the disregard for unspoken, material, life-tending labours; second, it produces a moment of epistemic instability that questions the very possibility of an expert metadiscourse on the catastrophe. Attention to the material everyday can alert us to participation done in gendered, classed, and raced ways. This has the potential of decluttering our democratic imagination. It can help us move past dichotomies that pit those who care about the environment against those who do not, by reminding us that some who might not express audible concern can nevertheless care .

Suggested Citation

  • Massilia Ourabah, 2025. "Doing the Unspeakable: Material Participation in Reprod-estr-uctive Labour," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(2), pages 434-451, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:434-451
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241293342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241293342
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241293342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheila Jasanoff, 2007. "Technologies of humility," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7166), pages 33-33, November.
    2. Georgios Kyroglou & Matt Henn, 2017. "Political Consumerism as a Neoliberal Response to Youth Political Disengagement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suvi Salmenniemi & Inna Perheentupa & Hanna Ylöstalo, 2025. "Political Imagination and Social Change," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(2), pages 345-362, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hallberg-Sramek, Isabella & Nordström, Eva-Maria & Priebe, Janina & Reimerson, Elsa & Mårald, Erland & Nordin, Annika, 2023. "Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Pangbourne, Kate & Mladenović, Miloš N. & Stead, Dominic & Milakis, Dimitris, 2020. "Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 35-49.
    3. E. Ligtermoet & C. Munera-Roldan & C. Robinson & Z. Sushil & P. Leith, 2025. "Preparing for knowledge co-production: A diagnostic approach to foster reflexivity for interdisciplinary research teams," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Arora-Jonsson, Seema, 2016. "Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 98-107.
    5. Karl Dudman & Sara Wit, 2021. "An IPCC that listens: introducing reciprocity to climate change communication," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Alexandra Albert, 2021. "Citizen social science in practice: the case of the Empty Houses Project," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Suhardiman, Diana & Moo, Saw Sha Bwe & Vaddhanaphuti, Chaya & Twa, Paul Sein, 2026. "Firebreaks as indigenous knowledge system and cultural practice: an emerging counternarrative in forest fire governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Alberto Matenhauer Urbinatti & Simone Ley Omori-Honda & Carolina Monteiro de Carvalho & Klaus Frey & Pedro Roberto Jacobi & Leandro Luiz Giatti, 2023. "‘Nexus’ Narratives in Urban Vulnerable Places: Pathways to Sustainability via Municipal Health Programs in Brazil," World, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Georgios Kyroglou & Matt Henn, 2022. "On Measuring Political Consumerism: An Exploratory Study Among Young People in the UK and in Greece," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 1191-1220, October.
    10. Paul Mkandawire & Isaac Luginaah & Rachel Bezner-Kerr, 2011. "Deadly divide: Malawi’s policy debate on HIV/AIDS and condoms," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(1), pages 81-102, March.
    11. Monika Büscher & Cronan Cronshaw & Alistair Kirkbride & Nicola Spurling, 2023. "Making Response-Ability: Societal Readiness Assessment for Sustainability Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Di Felice, Louisa Jane & Pérez-Sánchez, Laura & Manfroni, Michele & Giampietro, Mario, 2024. "Towards nexus thinking in energy systems modelling: A multi-scale, embodied perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Melo, Ana Teixeira & Caves, Leo Simon Dominic, 2018. "Complex systems of knowledge integration: A pragmatic proposal for coordinating and enhancing inter/transdisciplinarity," OSF Preprints 7v49b, Center for Open Science.
    14. Green, Sara & Carusi, Annamaria & Hoeyer, Klaus, 2022. "Plastic diagnostics: The remaking of disease and evidence in personalized medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    15. Andrea Saltelli & Monica Fiore, 2020. "From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Gritsenko, Daria, 2024. "Advancing UN digital cooperation: Lessons from environmental policy and governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Carlo Genova, 2018. "Youth Activism in Political Squats between Centri Sociali and Case Occupate," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, September.
    18. Bradley Allsop & Jacqueline Briggs & Ben Kisby, 2018. "Market Values and Youth Political Engagement in the UK: Towards an Agenda for Exploring the Psychological Impacts of Neo-Liberalism," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Sarah Mason‐Renton & Marco Vazquez & Connor Robinson & Gunilla Oberg, 2019. "Science for Policy: A Case Study of Scientific Polarization, Values, and the Framing of Risk and Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1229-1242, June.
    20. Pellizzone, Anna & Allansdottir, Agnes & De Franco, Roberto & Muttoni, Giovanni & Manzella, Adele, 2015. "Exploring public engagement with geothermal energy in southern Italy: A case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-11.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:434-451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.