IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v30y2025i1p209-224.html

Does the Liberalization of Masculine Space Improve Experiences for Sexual Minorities?

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Anderson

    (University of Winchester, UK)

  • Cyd Zeigler

    (Outsports, San Francisco, CA)

  • John Batten

    (University of Winchester, UK)

  • Joseph Reed

    (University of Winchester, UK)

  • Keith D. Parry

    (Bournemouth University, UK)

  • Rory Magrath

    (Solent University, UK)

Abstract

North American attitudes are liberalizing toward sexual minorities. This is even found within traditionally conservative, masculine institutions, like fraternities, religion, and the military. However, evidence for Liberalization Theory is mostly derived from attitudinal change of sexual and gender majorities alongside policy changes, with less evidence from sexual and gender minority experiences. Thus, there remain questions as to whether, or to what degree, improved majority attitudes promote sexual minority experiences. To investigate the impact of liberalization of the masculine organizational culture of team sports, we used survey results from 793 openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) high school and collegiate athletes, representing 981 coming out experiences. We find that 92.5% of high school and 97.1% of college athletes’ coming out-of-the-closet to teammates experiences were deemed to be from neutral to perfect. We also found no significant differences in overall experience in being out to teammates in highly masculinized teams sports compared to other sports at either the high school or collegiate level. These results suggest that liberalizing North American sexual majority attitudes do translate into improved LGBT experiences within the socially conservative institution of educationally based team sports.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Anderson & Cyd Zeigler & John Batten & Joseph Reed & Keith D. Parry & Rory Magrath, 2025. "Does the Liberalization of Masculine Space Improve Experiences for Sexual Minorities?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(1), pages 209-224, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:1:p:209-224
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241252525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241252525
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241252525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kath Browne, 2008. "Selling My Queer Soul or Queerying Quantitative Research?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(1), pages 200-214, January.
    2. Liam Wignall, 2017. "The Sexual Use of a Social Networking Site: The Case of Pup Twitter," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(3), pages 21-37, September.
    3. Brian Heaphy, 2008. "The Sociology of Lesbian and Gay Reflexivity or Reflexive Sociology?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(1), pages 188-199, January.
    4. Ryan Storr & Grant O’Sullivan & Ramón Spaaij & Caroline Symons, 2022. "Support for LGBT diversity and inclusion in sport: a mixed methods study of Australian cricket," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 723-747, October.
    5. Ashnil Murray & Adam White & Ryan Scoats & Eric Anderson, 2016. "Constructing Masculinities in the National Rugby League's Footy Show," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(3), pages 69-82, August.
    6. Jenny Van Hooff, 2015. "Desires, Expectations and the Sexual Practices of Married and Cohabiting Heterosexual Women," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 123-132, November.
    7. Sasha Roseneil, 2000. "Queer Frameworks and Queer Tendencies: Towards an Understanding of Postmodern Transformations of Sexuality," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 5(3), pages 58-70, December.
    8. Michaela Rogers & Anya Ahmed, 2017. "Interrogating Trans and Sexual Identities through the Conceptual Lens of Translocational Positionality," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 81-94, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenny van Hooff & Stephen P Morris, 2021. "Sexual Wellbeing and Social Class in Britain: An Analysis of Nationally Representative Survey Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 288-308, June.
    2. Jeffery Adams & Eric Julian Manalastas & Rommel Coquilla & Jed Montayre & Stephen Neville, 2022. "Exploring Understandings of Sexuality Among “Gay†Migrant Filipinos Living in New Zealand," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    3. Ruth Lewis & Cicely Marston & Kaye Wellings, 2013. "Bases, Stages and ‘Working your Way Up’: Young People's Talk about Non-Coital Practices and ‘Normal’ Sexual Trajectories," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(1), pages 233-241, February.
    4. John Christopher Gregory, 2023. "Leadership Characteristics Through The Lens of Translocational Positionality Framework: Trailblazing Women in Policing," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    5. Susan Marlow & Maura McAdam, 2012. "Analyzing the Influence of Gender upon High–Technology Venturing within the Context of Business Incubation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 655-676, July.
    6. Jenny Van Hooff, 2015. "Desires, Expectations and the Sexual Practices of Married and Cohabiting Heterosexual Women," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 123-132, November.
    7. Sarah Wilson, 2014. "Using Secondary Analysis to Maintain a Critically Reflexive Approach to Qualitative Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 53-64, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:1:p:209-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.