IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i1p166-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Time – University Students’ Study Practices and Policy Perceptions of Time

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Ulriksen

    (University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Christoffer Nejrup

    (University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

A particular concern in Danish higher education policy is how much time students spend studying, often addressed as ‘study intensity’ (defined as number of hours per week spent studying). This article discusses this concept and explores how students perceive the time they spend studying. We draw on ethnographic fieldwork, interviews and workshops among second-year students at four study programmes at a Danish research-intensive university: two in natural sciences, one in humanities, and one in social sciences. We found that students live their lives across different realms where only some relate to their university studies. The students continuously balanced their time between different activities and requirements. While students studied following time schedules, they also expressed a qualitative perception of time, for example, distinguishing between the work effort and the mental effort they put into studying. Spending time on study activities therefore does not necessarily mean investing mental, qualitative time. The emphasis on ‘study intensity’, and time as quantity in higher education policy and in student-engagement surveys fails to capture what drives students’ study practices, and policy measures run the risk of being detrimental to the study quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Ulriksen & Christoffer Nejrup, 2021. "Balancing Time – University Students’ Study Practices and Policy Perceptions of Time," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(1), pages 166-184, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:166-184
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420957036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420957036
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420957036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:166-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.