IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v20y2015i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drawing What Homelessness Looks Like: Using Creative Visual Methods as a Tool of Critical Pedagogy

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Dean

Abstract

This article presents findings from a creative qualitative study, where drawing was used as a methodological tool to investigate university students’ awareness of homelessness. Previous research ( Breeze and Dean 2012 ; 2013) has shown that homelessness charities often utilise stereotypical images in their fundraising campaigns, focusing on the arresting issue of rough sleeping (rooflessness) as opposed to other, more widespread experiences of homelessness. In drawing ‘what homelessness looks like’ the images students produce are often rooted in familiar local scenes - local roofless people they see regularly, or replications of common media images, with a tendency to depoliticise and individualise homelessness as a social issue. These drawings show striking similarities, common themes, and indicate a lack of critical engagement with the complex problems within personal homelessness narratives. The efficacy of the methodological approach is assessed, with the role creative methods such as drawing can play in stimulating critical discussion of issues, such as gender and the media, highlighted. The article also argues that such methods can play a role in critical pedagogy, encouraging deeply reflexive accounts of participants’ behaviour and knowledge. In policy terms however, this article concludes that it would be a risk for homelessness charities to utilise less stereotypical images in their fundraising materials, as the findings suggest such images align with those in the minds of potential donors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Dean, 2015. "Drawing What Homelessness Looks Like: Using Creative Visual Methods as a Tool of Critical Pedagogy," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3540
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Abrahams & Nicola Ingram, 2013. "The Chameleon Habitus: Exploring Local Students’ Negotiations of Multiple Fields," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 213-226, November.
    2. Alexandra Allan, 2012. "Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(3), pages 256-266, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robbe Geysmans & Lesley Hustinx, 2016. "Placing the distant other on the shelf: An analysis and comparison of (fair trade) coffee packages in relation to commodity fetishism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(1), pages 35-40, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiexiu Chen, 2022. "Hysteresis Effects and Emotional Suffering: Chinese Rural Students’ First Encounters With the Urban University," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 101-117, March.
    2. Megan Thiele & Amy Leisenring, 2022. "Class Incorporated: Stratified Patterns of Academic Engagement at a Highly Selective University," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 415-433, June.
    3. Andrea Lizama-Loyola & Denisse Sepúlveda & Alexandrina Vanke, 2022. "Making Sense of Social Mobility in Unequal Societies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 95-100, March.
    4. Tom Clark & Rita Hordósy, 2019. "Social Identification, Widening Participation and Higher Education: Experiencing Similarity and Difference in an English Red Brick University," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 353-369, September.
    5. Jessica Abrahams & Nicola Ingram, 2013. "The Chameleon Habitus: Exploring Local Students’ Negotiations of Multiple Fields," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 213-226, November.
    6. Jin Jin, 2022. "Class Identification, Deferred Elimination, and Social Reproduction in Education: ‘Ontological Ambivalences’ Experienced by Working-Class Students at Elite Universities in China," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(4), pages 896-913, December.
    7. Michael Donnelly & Alex Baratta & Sol Gamsu, 2019. "A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Accent and Social Mobility in the UK Teaching Profession," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(4), pages 496-513, December.
    8. Mark Holton, 2015. "Learning the rules of the ‘student game’: transforming the ‘student habitus’ through [im]mobility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(11), pages 2373-2388, November.
    9. Garth Stahl & Pamela Burnard & Rosie Perkins, 2017. "Critical Reflections on the Use of Bourdieu’s Tools ‘In Concert’ to Understand the Practices of Learning in Three Musical Sites," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(3), pages 57-77, September.
    10. Berenice Scandone, 2022. "‘I Don’t Want to Completely Lose Myself’: Social Mobility as Movement Across Classed, Ethnicised, and Gendered Spaces," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 172-188, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.