IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v19y2014i3p256-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thinking with ‘White Dee’: The Gender Politics of ‘Austerity Porn’

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Allen
  • Imogen Tyler
  • Sara De Benedictis

Abstract

Focusing on Benefits Street, and specifically the figure of White Dee, this rapid response article offers a feminist analysis of the relationship between media portrayals of people living with poverty and the gender politics of austerity. To do this we locate and unpick the paradoxical desires coalescing in the making and remaking of the figure of ‘White Dee’ in the public sphere. We detail how Benefits Street operates through forms of classed and gendered shaming to generate public consent for the government's welfare reform. However, we also examine how White Dee functions as a potential object of desire and figure of feminist resistance to the transformations in self and communities engendered by neoliberal social and economic policies. In this way, we argue that these public struggles over White Dee open up spaces for urgent feminist sociological enquiries into the gender politics of care, labour and social reproduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Allen & Imogen Tyler & Sara De Benedictis, 2014. "Thinking with ‘White Dee’: The Gender Politics of ‘Austerity Porn’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 256-262, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:3:p:256-262
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3439
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:3:p:256-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.