IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v18y2013i3p42-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘It Sounds Unwelcoming, It Sounds Exclusive, but I Think It's Just a Question of Arithmetic Really’: The Limits to White People's Anti-Essentialist Perspectives on the Nation

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Leddy-Owen

Abstract

Analysing data from qualitative interviews, this article demonstrates how white people's constructions of national identity in England destabilise but ultimately reaffirm essentialist, exclusionary boundaries. The first set of findings presented demonstrate the ways in which normalised associations between whiteness and Englishness are regularly, temporarily unsettled through empirical, experiential and ethical processes of reflection, only to be finally regulated back towards dominant, racialised understandings. The second set of findings presented demonstrate that for a minority of white participants who construct the nation in ways that more effectively challenge and destabilise racialised understandings, they nevertheless still normalise difference in relation to the nation-state boundaries of Britain. While racialised boundaries of the nation are often, to varying degrees, problematised by many white people in England, essentialist nation-state boundaries remain virtually unchallenged in discussions of national membership.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Leddy-Owen, 2013. "‘It Sounds Unwelcoming, It Sounds Exclusive, but I Think It's Just a Question of Arithmetic Really’: The Limits to White People's Anti-Essentialist Perspectives on the Nation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(3), pages 42-51, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:3:p:42-51
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:3:p:42-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.