IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v14y2009i5p105-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jade's Dying Body: The Ultimate Reality Show

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Walter

Abstract

The article analyses the scale of, and reactions to, print media coverage of the dying from cancer in 2009 of young British media celebrity Jade Goody. Some sociologists have argued that death is sequestrated, with the dying body particularly hidden and problematic; hence the sociological significance of the intense and high profile coverage of Jade's final weeks. In particular, the baroque emotionality of press photos, especially those which glamorised her baldness (the result of failed chemotherapy), challenges the sequestration thesis. Reactions were complex, with criticism of her public dying mixed with criticism of reality television in general, together with class prejudice. New media's blurring of public and private creates new arenas for publicising the bodily, personal and emotional experience of dying, while at the same time affirming the public/private boundary so that the ordinary dying of ordinary people remains substantially hidden.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Walter, 2009. "Jade's Dying Body: The Ultimate Reality Show," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(5), pages 105-115, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:14:y:2009:i:5:p:105-115
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2061
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Brennan, 2022. "Going Public: Performing Dying in the Second Decade of the 21st Century," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(4), pages 1040-1059, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:14:y:2009:i:5:p:105-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.