IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v13y2008i5p117-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Sociology of Resentment: A Debate on Class and Whiteness

Author

Listed:
  • Vron Ware

Abstract

This debate essay argues that there are urgent reasons why sociologists should pay attention to the history of resentment as ‘a political idea’. It offers different examples of the way the concept of white working class resentment has been routinely used in public discourse on race, immigration and multiculturalism in the UK. The BBC White Season is examined in detail as a framing device. Trends in political campaigning indicate increasing use of polling data to identify emotive issues, such as economic immigration and asylum seekers, which have been shown to be particularly divisive in marginal areas. In the context of policy-oriented, academic research on social cohesion, citizenship and belonging, social class and white identity emerge as key indicators of ‘resentment’. The Nietzschian concept of ressentiment, particularly as developed by German sociologist Max Scheler, is considered in order to complicate the broader psycho-social dynamics of resentment today. Finally, the essay discusses Ghassan Hage's work on affective attachments as a model of thinking through ‘resentment’ as a particular response to perceptions of waning racial privilege. The concept of ‘white decline’ and the subsequent embracing of victim identity precipitates political formations that endanger fragile multicultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Vron Ware, 2008. "Towards a Sociology of Resentment: A Debate on Class and Whiteness," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(5), pages 117-126, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:13:y:2008:i:5:p:117-126
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1802
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:13:y:2008:i:5:p:117-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.