Author
Listed:
- Julio Torales
- Marcelo O’Higgins
- Beatriz Di Martino
- Diana Kunihiro
- Liz Carbajal
- Fabiana Pereira
- Enrique Franco
- Anthon Daniel Torres-Romero
- Antonio Ventriglio
- João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia
- Tomás Caycho-RodrÃguez
- Iván Barrios
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric discharge summaries are vital for ensuring continuity of care, yet they are often written in technical language that can be difficult for patients to understand and may cause emotional distress or reinforce stigma. With increasing patient access to medical records, there is a pressing need to develop communication tools that are both comprehensible and emotionally safe. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic fidelity, linguistic clarity, emotional sensitivity, treatment comprehension, and readability of psychiatric discharge summaries rewritten by ChatGPT-4 based on real clinical cases. Methods: This was the first study in South America to examine the use of a generative language model for rewriting psychiatric discharge summaries. A mixed-methods, observational cross-sectional design was applied. Twenty-five anonymized clinical cases were rewritten using ChatGPT-4. Three psychiatrists independently assessed each AI-generated summary across four dimensions: diagnostic fidelity, clarity of language, perceived emotional risk, and understanding of treatment. Readability was evaluated using the Fernández-Huerta Index and the INFLESZ Scale. A thematic analysis of evaluators’ written comments was also conducted. Results: Summaries generated by ChatGPT-4 were rated positively, particularly for clarity and treatment explanation. Significant improvements in readability were observed across all diagnostic groups ( p  
Suggested Citation
Julio Torales & Marcelo O’Higgins & Beatriz Di Martino & Diana Kunihiro & Liz Carbajal & Fabiana Pereira & Enrique Franco & Anthon Daniel Torres-Romero & Antonio Ventriglio & João Mauricio Castalde, 2026.
"ChatGPT-4 in Psychiatric Discharge Summaries: Toward a More Comprehensible and Emotionally Sensitive Clinical Communication,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(4), pages 931-943, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:4:p:931-943
DOI: 10.1177/00207640251391255
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:4:p:931-943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.