Author
Abstract
Background: Generation Z faces unprecedented mental health challenges in a hyperconnected digital environment. While technology offers benefits such as access to resources and support networks, it also poses risks including anxiety, depression, and social comparison. Comprehensive studies integrating diverse methods to examine these challenges remain limited. Aims: This study investigates the intersection of digital engagement and psychological well-being among Generation Z, with a focus on identifying risks and exploring proactive strategies for resilience. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining (1) bibliometric analysis of 1,103 Scopus-indexed publications (2020–2024) using VOSviewer, (2) qualitative content analysis of 500 social media posts across TikTok, Twitter/X, and Instagram, and (3) semi-structured interviews with eight experts in psychiatry, psychology, and digital education. Data were triangulated to enhance validity. Results: The bibliometric analysis revealed three dominant research clusters centered on psychopathology, resilience and public health, and developmental/family-oriented perspectives. Social media discourse emphasized risk narratives, self-presentation pressures, peer support, and digital detox practices. Expert interviews highlighted rising clinical risks, identity strain, untapped peer support, and gaps in policy and education. Triangulated findings show convergence on risks, but also divergence where lived experiences and expert perspectives foreground coping strategies and resilience overlooked in the academic literature. Conclusions: Hyperconnectivity functions as both a stressor and a source of resilience for Gen Z. A multidimensional approach involving individuals, educators, policymakers, and digital platforms is necessary to promote digital well-being and strengthen youth mental resilience in the hyperconnected world.
Suggested Citation
Dani Fadillah & Bai Long, 2026.
"Empowering Gen Z’s Mental Health in a Hyperconnected World,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(4), pages 876-887, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:4:p:876-887
DOI: 10.1177/00207640251384510
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:4:p:876-887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.