IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v72y2026i3p668-678.html

Revictimization and Mental Health Service Use in Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparison of Single and Multiple Reports Using Linked Police and Health Registers

Author

Listed:
  • Tomomi Hisasue
  • Marie Kruse
  • Johanna Hietamäki
  • Jani Raitanen
  • Visa Martikainen
  • Kimmo Suokas
  • Pekka Rissanen
  • Sami Pirkola

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) contributes to the development and severity of mental health problems, and pre-existing mental disorders are also associated with victimization. IPV is rarely a single event, and the consequences of revictimization appear to be more severe. However, little is known about patterns of mental health service utilization among individuals exposed to IPV revictimization. Aims: The study aims to estimate the associations between IPV revictimization and mental health service use over a 2-year period. Furthermore, we examine the association between pre-existing mental disorders and the risk of IPV revictimization. Methods: We conducted a register-based study including IPV victims identified from police reports in Finland, aged 19 to 54 years ( N  = 10,195), comparing single ( N  = 7,547) and multiple reports ( N  = 2,648) between 2016 and 2018. We applied the difference-in-differences method to estimate the effects of revictimization on mental health service utilization 1 year before and after the IPV event. Risk factors for revictimization were assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Results: Compared to the single event group, IPV victims with multiple reports exhibited higher mental health service utilization throughout the 2-year study period. In both groups, mental health service use peaked sharply around the time of the IPV event. The increase in mental health service utilization for IPV revictimization was approximately 8.0%, with a 0.9 percentage point rise following the initial IPV event. Pre-existing substance use disorders were significant predictors of revictimization for both men and women. Conclusion: Our main finding of higher mental health service use among IPV victims with multiple reports highlights the critical importance of early intervention. These results could reflect underlying poor socioeconomic conditions, pre-existing mental health conditions, and/or traumatic experience before the initial IPV report. Developing integrated services across mental health, social, and police services is crucial for providing preventative interventions to reduce further revictimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomomi Hisasue & Marie Kruse & Johanna Hietamäki & Jani Raitanen & Visa Martikainen & Kimmo Suokas & Pekka Rissanen & Sami Pirkola, 2026. "Revictimization and Mental Health Service Use in Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparison of Single and Multiple Reports Using Linked Police and Health Registers," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(3), pages 668-678, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:3:p:668-678
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640251379256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640251379256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640251379256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:3:p:668-678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.