Author
Listed:
- Arshia Sood
- Abhishek Ghosh
- Kathirvel Soundappan
- Renjith Ramakrishna Pillai
- Debasish Basu
Abstract
Background and Aim: Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a major public health issue, exacerbated by public stigma that hinders treatment-seeking and social integration. This study aimed to adapt and validate a social-contact-based intervention to reduce public stigma against individuals with OUD in India, ensuring cultural relevance and feasibility. Methods: The study followed a two-phase approach: adaptation and validation using the ADAPT framework and Delphi method with 14 multi-disciplinary experts and people with lived experience (PWLE), and pre-experimental, open-label pilot study assessing feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact on stigma. Participants ( n  = 30) attended a 60- to 90-min session combining an educational component with direct social contact with PWLE. Stigma was assessed using a validated questionnaire at baseline, 48 hr, and 3 months. Correlation analysis was done between total stigma and domain-wise scores. Results: The intervention achieved a 90% session completion rate, with 69.2% of approached individuals consenting to participate. Acceptability measures indicated high engagement, with 90% of participants rating the session as useful, although 36.6% found it challenging to reconcile with pre-existing beliefs. Stigma scores significantly improved at 48 hr post-intervention in the Attribution Blame domain ( p  = .002) and Attribution Exoneration domain ( p  = .079, trend toward significance). Partial attenuation of stigma reduction effects was observed at 3 months. The Total Stigma Score was significantly correlated with Punishment ( r  = .733, p  
Suggested Citation
Arshia Sood & Abhishek Ghosh & Kathirvel Soundappan & Renjith Ramakrishna Pillai & Debasish Basu, 2026.
"Acceptability and Feasibility of a Social Contact Based Intervention for Reduction of Public Stigma Against Persons With Opioid Use Disorder,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(3), pages 538-553, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:3:p:538-553
DOI: 10.1177/00207640251370404
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:3:p:538-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.