IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v72y2026i3p439-450.html

Gender Differences in Depression Prevalence, Influencing Factors, Life Satisfaction, and Network Structure Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: A National Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Gui
  • Pan Chen
  • Sha Sha
  • Ling Zhang
  • Zhaohui Su
  • Teris Cheung
  • Gabor S. Ungvari
  • Chee H. Ng
  • Yu-Tao Xiang

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of depression is high in China especially among older adults. This study aimed to explore the gender differences in depression prevalence, influencing factors, network structure, and their relationship with life satisfaction among middle-aged and older adults in China. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study based on the data from the fifth wave (2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). We performed network analyses and applied expected influence (EI) to identify the most central symptoms. Results: A total of 15,834 middle-aged and older adults were included in this study. The prevalence of depression among women was (45.5%, 95% CI [44.4%, 46.6%]), which was significantly higher than men (29.1%; 95% CI [28.1%, 30.1%]). In both women and men, older age (OR = 1.006), living in village areas (OR = 1.7), having a job (OR = 1.2), activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (OR = 2.2), and experiencing pain (OR = 1.8) were significantly associated with a higher risk for depression. Additionally, being married (OR = 0.7) and having better perceived health status (e.g. good vs. normal: OR = 0.5; poor vs. normal: OR = 2.2) were associated with a lower risk of depression across both genders. Moreover, network comparison of depressive symptoms by gender found that the most central symptom across gender groups was similar. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)-3 (“Feeling depressed†; corresponding to the item “I felt depressed†from the 10-item, CESD-10; EI value = 1.079) was the most central symptom in the depression network for both genders, while CESD-8 (“Lack of happiness†; corresponding to the item “I felt happy†from the CESD-10, reverse scored; average edge weight (AEW) = −0.15) had the strongest negative correlation with life satisfaction. Conclusion: In this study of middle-aged and older adults, women were more likely to have depression than men. The results identified influential symptoms which should be prioritized to promote emotional well-being and enhance life satisfaction in this population. There is a critical need to develop gender-sensitive mental health strategies and public health interventions aimed at alleviating the burden of depression among older adults in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Gui & Pan Chen & Sha Sha & Ling Zhang & Zhaohui Su & Teris Cheung & Gabor S. Ungvari & Chee H. Ng & Yu-Tao Xiang, 2026. "Gender Differences in Depression Prevalence, Influencing Factors, Life Satisfaction, and Network Structure Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: A National Survey," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(3), pages 439-450, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:3:p:439-450
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640251370792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640251370792
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640251370792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:3:p:439-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.