IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v72y2026i2p269-280.html

Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Thijs J. Burger
  • Hans J. de Haas
  • Robin M. Van Eck
  • Martijn Kikkert
  • Frederike Schirmbeck
  • Astrid Vellinga
  • Lieuwe de Haan
  • Mariken B. de Koning

Abstract

Background: People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process. Aims: To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery. Method: A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity. Results: The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years ( SD 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, SD 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, SD 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals. Conclusions: For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Thijs J. Burger & Hans J. de Haas & Robin M. Van Eck & Martijn Kikkert & Frederike Schirmbeck & Astrid Vellinga & Lieuwe de Haan & Mariken B. de Koning, 2026. "Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(2), pages 269-280, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:2:p:269-280
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640251358418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640251358418
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640251358418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:2:p:269-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.