IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v72y2026i1p70-80.html

Perceived social support and coping strategies in patients with depression: A longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Saliha Özsoy
  • Sümeyye Akbayrak
  • Özlem Olguner Eker
  • Mustafa BaÅŸtürk

Abstract

Aims: When the etiology of major depression is examined, the existence of psychosocial factors is undeniably important. Inadequate social support and use of dysfunctional coping strategies are psychosocial factors that play a role in the etiology of depression. This study investigated the perceived social support and coping strategies in patients with depression and whether they change with remission. Design: Both cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys were conducted. Methods: This study included 50 patients in the active phase of a major depressive disorder, 30 patients in the remission of depression, and 50 healthy controls. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and Assessment Scale for Coping Attitudes (COPE) were applied to all subjects. The same scales were repeated in 20 patients, who were in the active phase of depression at the beginning of the study and were in remission after approximately 3 years of follow-up. Psychometric test scores of three groups were compared with one-way ANOVA test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and post hoc tests. In the longitudinal analysis, the paired t -test and Wilcoxon tests were used. Results: The patients’ perceived social support scores were lower than the remission and control groups ( p  

Suggested Citation

  • Saliha Özsoy & Sümeyye Akbayrak & Özlem Olguner Eker & Mustafa BaÅŸtürk, 2026. "Perceived social support and coping strategies in patients with depression: A longitudinal study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 72(1), pages 70-80, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:1:p:70-80
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640251353680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640251353680
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640251353680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:72:y:2026:i:1:p:70-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.