Author
Listed:
- Hira Ahmad
- Alasdair Forrest
- Martin Rotenberg
Abstract
Background: People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care. Aims: This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment. Method: Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study. Results: Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction. Conclusions: The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.
Suggested Citation
Hira Ahmad & Alasdair Forrest & Martin Rotenberg, 2025.
"Immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders: A scoping review,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(8), pages 1427-1452, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:8:p:1427-1452
DOI: 10.1177/00207640251353689
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:8:p:1427-1452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.