IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v71y2025i7p1235-1246.html

Religiosity and spirituality in coping with suicide grief: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Alexandre Silva de Almeida
  • Augusto Ossamu Shintani
  • Pedrita Reis Vargas
  • Ives Cavalcante Passos
  • Alexander Moreira-Almeida

Abstract

Background: Although religiosity and spirituality are recognized as important protective factors against suicide, little research has explored their role in the grief process following suicide loss. Aims: To investigate the existing evidence about the impact of religiosity and spirituality on suicide grief. Method: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases for original empirical studies examining the association between religiosity and spirituality and the grief experience of suicide loss survivors. Results: Eleven studies were identified, the majority ( n  = 7) conducted in the United States of America and published between 2000 and 2023. The methodological approaches included qualitative ( n  = 9), quantitative ( n  = 1), and longitudinal ( n  = 1) studies. Sample sizes ranged from 10 to 1,432 participants, primarily composed of women, Christians, and adults. The findings highlight the complex relationship between religiosity and spirituality and suicide grief. In general, religiosity and spirituality functioned as a source of support, a sanctuary, and a catalyst for personal and spiritual growth, facilitating meaning-making and the restructuring of the loss through belief systems, spiritual experiences, and coping strategies. However, in some cases, religiosity and spirituality also posed challenges, complicating the adaptation to suicide grief. Limitations: Limited research on the topic, with a predominance of qualitative studies and samples largely composed of Christian, Western, and female participants. None of the selected articles focused specifically on religiosity and spirituality as a central research variable, underscoring the need for more in-depth investigations. Conclusion: Despite the identified challenges, religiosity and spirituality were generally considered significant coping factors in suicide grief. The limited available evidence suggests that religiosity and spirituality may play a crucial role in the grieving process following suicide loss and warrants further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Alexandre Silva de Almeida & Augusto Ossamu Shintani & Pedrita Reis Vargas & Ives Cavalcante Passos & Alexander Moreira-Almeida, 2025. "Religiosity and spirituality in coping with suicide grief: A review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(7), pages 1235-1246, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:7:p:1235-1246
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640251345508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640251345508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640251345508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Austėja Agnietė Čepulienė & Paulius Skruibis, 2022. "The Role of Spirituality during Suicide Bereavement: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yossi Levi-Belz & Karolina Krysinska & Karl Andriessen, 2023. "What Do We Know about Suicide Bereavement, and What We Can Do to Help Suicide-Loss Survivors?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-5, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:7:p:1235-1246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.