Author
Listed:
- Joana Corrêa de Magalhães Narvaez
- Josiane Rocha Carvalho
- VinÃcius Serafini Roglio
- Luiza Corrêa de Magalhães Dutra
- Félix Kessler
- Antonio Ventriglio
- Flavio Pechansky
Abstract
Background: Substance Use Disorders are often associated with significant levels of domestic and external violence registered among abusers. This investigation aimed to evaluate the Domestic Violence Involvement (DVI) and related gender differences among Crack Cocaine Users in Brazil. Methods: For this purpose, a secondary data analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study involving 780 Crack Cocaine Users from 6 Brazilian capitals was performed. Results: The prevalence of DVI among abusers was not different between males and females. Crack-cocaine users with DVI versus without DVI experienced significantly more aggressions and beatings as victims throughout their life (54.7% vs. 40.5%), showed greater difficulty in controlling the impulse to assault or hurt someone throughout their life (65% vs. 36.4%), higher number of physical aggressions (25.9% vs. 11.6%), car theft (27.3% vs. 16.9%), violent crimes (12.9% vs. 6.2%). Men also reported a higher prevalence of detentions/arrests (61%) than women, while women were more frequently charged over their parental powers than men. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that DVI in Crack-Cocaine users may be a potential predictor of social violence in general with no significant differences between males and females. Legal punishments remain related to the cultural role assigned to each gender with men being more likely to be detained in their lives and women being reported more for parental neglect.
Suggested Citation
Joana Corrêa de Magalhães Narvaez & Josiane Rocha Carvalho & VinÃcius Serafini Roglio & Luiza Corrêa de Magalhães Dutra & Félix Kessler & Antonio Ventriglio & Flavio Pechansky, 2025.
"Domestic and external violence, parental neglect, and social sanctions among crack users: A cross-sectional study exploring the role of gender,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(5), pages 853-862, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:853-862
DOI: 10.1177/00207640241307869
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:853-862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.