Author
Listed:
- MarÃa Bernal Arenas
- Andrés Arroyo-Sánchez
- Úrsula Torres Parejo
- José Eduardo Muñoz-Negro
Abstract
Background: Gender disparity in mental health treatment has been a longstanding concern in healthcare. Women, who are disproportionately diagnosed with anxiety and depression, often receive more psychotropic medication than men. Aims: This study investigates gender disparity in the treatment of anxiety and depression, aiming to uncover the intersection of medical and social factors and their influence on psychiatric care. Methods: A systematic review methodology following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Web of Science, including observational studies and excluding qualitative studies, which resulted in the screening of eight studies for an in-depth analysis which included meta-analysis. The GRADE approach was considered to address risk of bias. Results: The findings of this review reveal a clear gender disparity in the treatment of anxiety and depression, with women consistently experiencing over-treatment when compared to men, even after adjusting for mental health status and diagnosis frequency, with statistically significant results for the meta-analysis (PR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.12, 1.78]), concluding that women are 54% more likely than men of receiving psychotropic treatment for anxiety and depression. The reduced number of studies included is acknowledged as a limitation of the study. Conclusions: Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive understanding of biopsychosocial factors, integrating gender-inclusive politics into medical education and clinical practices. Recognizing and mitigating these underlying causes is paramount to reduce gender-based disparities in mental health and promoting better practices to achieve equitable health outcomes.
Suggested Citation
MarÃa Bernal Arenas & Andrés Arroyo-Sánchez & Úrsula Torres Parejo & José Eduardo Muñoz-Negro, 2025.
"A systematic review and meta-analysis on gender differences in the treatment of anxiety and depression,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(5), pages 835-843, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:835-843
DOI: 10.1177/00207640251331898
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:835-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.