IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v71y2025i4p770-781.html

An attempt to integrate information from young children into parent/teacher-based mental health evaluation of child internalizing disorders in epidemiological surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Viviane Kovess-Masfety
  • Yvon Motreff
  • Mauro Giovanni Carta
  • Roy Otten
  • Zlatka Mihova
  • Stéphanie Monnier-Besnard
  • Nolwenn Regnault

Abstract

Background: To date, most large surveys on the mental health of children under 11 years old have relied exclusively on data collected from parents and teachers, with no information from children themselves. However, these children are valuable informants despite their young age. Objective: To evaluate the effects of adding young children’s self-evaluation of internalizing disorders to a combined teacher/parent-based algorithm using data from a European survey carried out in Italy, Bulgaria, and in the Netherlands. Method: Comparing concordances with the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA; considered as the gold standard) of a Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire’s (SDQ) parent/teacher-based predictive algorithm, with and without integrating a child self-evaluation. The child self-evaluation was using the Dominic Interactive (DI), a computerized, pictorial, self-administered questionnaire for young children, which followed DSM 5 diagnoses definitions for internalized disorders. The concordance comparisons concerned 238 children, 5 to 12 years old from out-patient clinics, double evaluated, using kappa concordance test . Subsequent variations in disorder prevalence were evaluated in cross-sectional surveys in the general populations of the three study countries ( n  = 3,442). Results: Adding self-evaluated child DI-based ‘probable’ internalizing disorder diagnoses to the SDQ parent/teacher algorithm increased concordance with gold standard: kappa increased from .25 (.14–.37) to .36 (.23–.49). In terms of population-based data, this addition increased the prevalence of ‘probable’ emotional disorders from 2.00 % (1.56–2.53) to 3.63 % (3.03–4.31) and revealed an expected gender difference. Conclusion: The inclusion of young children’s self-reported data on internalizing disorders is a valuable addition to the generally used combined parent/teacher-based SDQ algorithm, and therefore better reflects the true prevalence of these disorders in these children. Further evaluation on larger validation samples is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Viviane Kovess-Masfety & Yvon Motreff & Mauro Giovanni Carta & Roy Otten & Zlatka Mihova & Stéphanie Monnier-Besnard & Nolwenn Regnault, 2025. "An attempt to integrate information from young children into parent/teacher-based mental health evaluation of child internalizing disorders in epidemiological surveys," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(4), pages 770-781, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:4:p:770-781
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640241303018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640241303018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640241303018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janni Niclasen & Thomas William Teasdale & Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen & Anne Mette Skovgaard & Hanne Elberling & Carsten Obel, 2012. "Psychometric Properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: The SDQ Assessed for More than 70,000 Raters in Four Different Cohorts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dietrichson, Jens & Klokker, Rasmus H., 2024. "Predicting preschool problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Jun Wang & Ke Liu & Jing Zheng & Jiali Liu & Liming You, 2017. "Prevalence of Mental Health Problems and Associated Risk Factors among Rural-to-Urban Migrant Children in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0218518 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jensen, Bente & Jensen, Peter & Rasmussen, Astrid Würtz, 2017. "Does professional development of preschool teachers improve children's socio-emotional outcomes?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 26-39.
    5. Heba J. Sabbagh & Ghadeer Sharton & Jumana Almaghrabi & Manal Al-Malik & Mona Hassan Ahmed Hassan & Narmin Helal, 2021. "Effect of Environmental Tobacco Smoke on Children’s Anxiety and Behavior in Dental Clinics, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Del Bono, Emilia & Etheridge, Ben & Garcia, Paul, 2024. "The economic value of childhood socio-emotional skills," ISER Working Paper Series 2024-01, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0220193 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0176605 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Eiberg, Misja & Olsen, Rikke Fuglsang, 2022. "Too high or too low? the role of educational expectations for children in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:4:p:770-781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.