IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v71y2025i3p546-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public acceptance of coercive measures in Nigerian mental health care

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Oyine Aluh
  • Daniel Ifeanyichukwu Agu
  • Wisdom Joe Igbokwe
  • Ifunanya Genevieve Anunwa

Abstract

Background: For the first time, Nigeria has enacted a new mental health law that regulates the use of coercive measures in mental health care. Aim: The study aimed to investigate the extent to which the Nigerian public accepts the use of coercive measures in the treatment of people with mental health conditions and to understand the impact of stigma and other sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 615 adult respondents from Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones. The study instrument included a case-specific vignette, a social distance scale, and a brief sociodemographic form. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted with SPSS v.25 software. Results: More than half of the study respondents agreed that the vignette character should be forced to go to the hospital if he refuses to go (65%, n  = 400), and he should be forced to take medications at the psychiatric hospital (55.1%, n  = 339). The least accepted coercive measure was Isolation (28.8%, n  = 177). There were significant associations between social distance and the acceptance of involuntary admissions, forced medication, mechanical restraints, and isolation ( p  

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Oyine Aluh & Daniel Ifeanyichukwu Agu & Wisdom Joe Igbokwe & Ifunanya Genevieve Anunwa, 2025. "Public acceptance of coercive measures in Nigerian mental health care," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(3), pages 546-553, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:3:p:546-553
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640241296050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640241296050
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640241296050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:3:p:546-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.