IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v70y2024i5p850-860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attachment styles and associated psychosocial factors in patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Barbeito
  • Rocío Gómez-Juncal
  • Patricia Vega
  • Juan Antonio Becerra
  • Eleni Petkari
  • Ana González-Pinto
  • Teresa Sánchez-Gutiérrez

Abstract

Background: Patients with an ultra-high risk of psychosis (UHR) are more likely to transition to psychosis. Attachment style has also been associated with psychosis and other symptoms. Aims: To review attachment styles in UHR patients and to analyze related psychosocial factors. Ours is the first systematic review of attachment in this population. Method: We performed a systematic review of attachment and related psychosocial factors in UHR patients following the PRISMA methodology. Results: We identified five studies. The results revealed high rates of insecure attachment in this population (more than 80%). The UHR sample presented high levels of depression, anxiety, social anxiety, emotional reactivity, trauma, and poor mentalization. Premorbid social adjustment was a predictor of improvement in disorganization and negative symptoms. The rate of transition to psychosis was 10%. Attachment patterns accounted for 16.8% of the variance. This vulnerability for psychosis was also associated with poor mentalization. Conclusion: Early detection of patients with UHR and insecure attachment is crucial, since early intervention to address symptoms, mentalization, and attachment is feasible and may lead to an improvement in the remaining associated psychosocial related factors (secure style: better global functioning and less affective and anxious symptoms). PROSPERO ID440957

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Barbeito & Rocío Gómez-Juncal & Patricia Vega & Juan Antonio Becerra & Eleni Petkari & Ana González-Pinto & Teresa Sánchez-Gutiérrez, 2024. "Attachment styles and associated psychosocial factors in patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A systematic review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(5), pages 850-860, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:5:p:850-860
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231224661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231224661
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231224661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:5:p:850-860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.