IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v69y2023i7p1704-1711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The complex impact of family caregiver kinship type on the rehabilitation of patients with mental disorders in rural communities of China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Ji
  • Sui Xin
  • Wang Xijin
  • Qiu Xue
  • He Xu

Abstract

Background: In 2009, the Chinese government incorporated severe mental disorders into the central subsidized local health funding project for the effective management, treatment, and reintegration of patients with severe mental disorders from hospitals into the community (Project 686). The conditions that were classified as ‘severe’ by this project included: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders, paranoid disorders, bipolar disorders, mental disorders caused by epilepsy, and mental retardation accompanying mental disorders. Patients in rural communities received better care after project implementation, of which 62.91% were farmers. Objective: This paper attempts to investigate the complex impact of Project 686 on the levels of rehabilitation of patients by their families. Methods: The last follow-up visit of the community psychiatrists in city H in 2020 was used as the time point. Finally, 174 samples were used in the analysis model. The type of kinship between family caregivers and patients with mental disorders was operationalized according to the information provided under the ‘primary caregiver’ item within the basic information section of the follow-up form. The software Stata15 was used to perform descriptive statistics, baseline regression model analysis, and a robustness test on the types of kinship identified and patients’ recovery. Results: The types of kinship, current symptoms, and medication use all affected patients’ recovery, were found to have regression coefficients of −0.148, −1.756, and 0.902, respectively. Parents of patients with mental disorders remain in the caregiver category with the largest proportion. Community acceptance of patients is high; current symptoms, medication use, and types of caregiver-patient relationships influence patients’ recovery levels. Conclusions and discussion: Project 686 has solved some of the rehabilitation and living difficulties of patients with mental disorders in rural communities. The types of kinship between family caregivers and patients with mental disorders in rural communities affect patients’ rehabilitation levels. Patients’ current symptoms and medication use can effectively moderate the impact of kinship type on patients’ recovery in terms of complete self-knowledge, productive work, and life and good social relationships. It is necessary for mental illness prevention-treatment organizations to establish supplemental, replacement, and substitution mechanisms for the life and rehabilitation of patients with mental disorders in rural communities. Furthermore, the sense of reward and concern for family caregivers should be actively enhanced, and greater scientific use of the rehabilitation function of the ‘family care + village doctor management’ model should be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Ji & Sui Xin & Wang Xijin & Qiu Xue & He Xu, 2023. "The complex impact of family caregiver kinship type on the rehabilitation of patients with mental disorders in rural communities of China," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(7), pages 1704-1711, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:1704-1711
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231174367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231174367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231174367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Li & Ernest Chui Wing‐tak, 2016. "Community care for adults with severe mental disorders in rural China: A case study," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 273-282, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:1704-1711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.