IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v69y2023i7p1617-1625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes 1 year after a first episode of psychosis in migrants to the Republic of Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Brian O’Donoghue
  • Eric Roche
  • John Lyne
  • Laoise Renwick
  • Mary Clarke

Abstract

Background: Migration is a robust risk factor for developing a psychotic disorder, yet there is a paucity of research on the outcomes of migrants who develop a psychotic disorder. Identifying sub-groups within FEP cohorts who have a poorer outcome, could assist in the development and delivery of more targeted interventions. Aims: There is a paucity of research on the outcomes of migrants who develop a psychotic disorder. This study aimed to evaluate a broad range of outcomes for those with a FEP who migrated to the Republic of Ireland, including: (i) symptomatic; (ii) functional; (iii) hospitalisation and (iv) engagement with psychosocial services. Methods: All individuals with a FEP aged 18 to 65 who presented between 01.02.2006 and 01.07.2014 were included. Structured and validated instruments were used to measure positive, negative, depressive symptoms and insight. Results: Of the 573 individuals with a FEP, 22.3% were first-generation migrants and 63.4% ( n  = 363) were followed up at 1 year. At this time, 72.4% of migrants were in remission of positive psychotic symptoms compared to 78.5% of the Irish born ( OR  = 0.84, 95% CI [0.50–1.41], p  = .51). In relation to negative symptoms, 60.5% of migrants were in remission compared to 67.2% of the Irish born ( OR  = 0.75, 95% CI [0.44–1.27], p  = .283). There was no difference in the severity of positive, negative or depressive symptoms between groups and there was a trend for the Irish born to have better insight ( p  = .056). The functional outcomes were similar across groups. One third of migrants were admitted to hospital compared to 28.7% of the Irish born ( OR  = 1.24, 95% CI [0.73–2.13], p  = .426). Just over half of both groups attended CBT and 46.2% of caregivers for migrants attended the psychoeducation programme, compared to 39.7% for the Irish born ( OR  = 1.30, 95% CI [0.79–2.16], p  = .306). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that migrants have broadly similar outcomes to the native-born populations, however there is still considerable scope for the outcomes for all individuals affected by psychotic disorders to be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian O’Donoghue & Eric Roche & John Lyne & Laoise Renwick & Mary Clarke, 2023. "Outcomes 1 year after a first episode of psychosis in migrants to the Republic of Ireland," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(7), pages 1617-1625, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:1617-1625
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231174360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231174360
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231174360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Tarsitani & Bianca Della Rocca & Corinna Pancheri & Massimo Biondi & Massimo Pasquini & Stefano Ferracuti & Antonio Ventriglio & Gabriele Mandarelli, 2022. "Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization among migrants in Italy: A matched sample study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(2), pages 429-434, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:1617-1625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.