IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i8p1716-1726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compulsory and voluntary admissions in comparison: A 9-year long observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Draghetti
  • Siegfried Alberti
  • Gianluca Borgiani
  • Fabio Panariello
  • Diana De Ronchi
  • Anna Rita Atti

Abstract

Background: Few studies, so far, have been specifically designed to highlight the features related to Compulsory Admissions (CA) and Voluntary Admissions (VA) in Italian psychiatric emergency wards. Aims: The main purpose of this observational study was to compare the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of VA and CA and to explore possible predictors of re-admissions. Methods: During a 6-month Index Period (February, the 1st–July, the 31st 2008) all psychiatric admissions were documented and then followed-up through all available informatic systems for the next 9 years. Results: Out of 390 hospitalizations, 101 (25.9%) were compulsory (CA rate was 2.79 per 10,000 inhabitants per year, mean duration of hospitalizations of 7.33 ± 7.84 days). Diagnoses were recorded for the 325 patients who had been hospitalized during index period: schizophrenic psychoses ([ p  = .042], in particular schizophrenia [ p  = .027]), manic episode ( p  = .044), and delusional disorders ( p  = .009) were associated with CA; conversely, the diagnosis of unipolar major depression ( p  = .005) and personality disorders ( p  = .048) were significantly more frequent in VA. The 325 admitted patients were followed up for 1,801 person-years. No significant differences were found in terms of drop-outs, transferring, and discharge rates, and mortality rates due to both natural causes and suicides. Factors associated with at least one compulsory readmission were younger age and having had a previous CA ( p  = .011); conversely having been engaged with psychiatric services for over 1 year prior to index hospitalization was protective for a subsequent CA ( p  = .013). Conclusions: After a 40-year old political reform, the current study shows that, in a context of integrated outpatient and inpatient services, engagement with outpatient care may be protective for compulsory rehospitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Draghetti & Siegfried Alberti & Gianluca Borgiani & Fabio Panariello & Diana De Ronchi & Anna Rita Atti, 2022. "Compulsory and voluntary admissions in comparison: A 9-year long observational study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(8), pages 1716-1726, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:8:p:1716-1726
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640211057731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640211057731
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640211057731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:8:p:1716-1726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.