IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i8p1671-1681.html

How does the British public understand mental health? A qualitative analysis of open-text responses

Author

Listed:
  • Megan Arnot
  • Miranda Wolpert
  • Ethan Greenwood

Abstract

Background: An individual’s understanding of mental health can influence their attitudes towards those experiencing mental health problems, and also impact their response to any mental health problems they experience. However, what the lay public understand about mental health is not well explored in existing research. Aims: This study aims to gain a deeper insight into what the general public understand by the term ‘mental health problem’. Methods: Data were taken from a large-scale representative sample of adults from Great Britain ( n  = 2,708). A thematic analysis was carried out on an open-text question which asked people what they understood by the term ‘mental health problem’. Results: Six themes were identified in the thematic analysis, which included understanding mental health through thinking about cause and effect, thinking about the location of mental health problems in the body, the universality and variation of mental health problems, reflections on lived experience and identifying a specific mental health problem. Conclusion: The analysis suggests that there are many diverse ways the public conceptualises mental health. The themes identified may be useful for future quantitative analyses, and also may suggest how information about mental health can be best communicated to the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan Arnot & Miranda Wolpert & Ethan Greenwood, 2022. "How does the British public understand mental health? A qualitative analysis of open-text responses," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(8), pages 1671-1681, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:8:p:1671-1681
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640211052174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640211052174
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640211052174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Butlin & Keith Laws & Rebecca Read & Matthew D Broome & Shivani Sharma, 2019. "Concepts of mental disorders in the United Kingdom: Similarities and differences between the lay public and psychiatrists," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(6), pages 507-514, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:8:p:1671-1681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.