IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i5p1100-1107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptability of reducing sedentariness using a mobile-phone application based on ‘if then’ plans for people with psychosis: A focus-group study conducted in North West England, UK

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Bailey
  • Y Kiera Bartlett
  • Lamiece Hassan
  • Christopher J Armitage
  • Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell
  • Matthew Machin
  • Shon Lewis
  • Tracy Epton

Abstract

Objective: To understand the acceptability of (a) reducing sedentary-behaviour in people with psychosis using ‘if-then’ plans and (b) the proposed app content. Design: Qualitative acceptability study. Method: Three structured focus-groups and an interview were conducted with eight participants who had experience of a psychotic episode. They discussed sedentary-behaviour, being more active, critical situations in which they may be tempted to be sedentary and solutions to these (the if-then plans), and a mock-up of the mobile application. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) was used to analyse qualitatively the transcripts. Results: All TFA constructs were coded in each of the transcripts. The idea of reducing sedentary-behaviour was acceptable to people with psychosis, participants knew the importance of being more active, however it is not always their main priority. Likewise, the proposed content of the app was found to be acceptable, with participants already using some of the proposed solutions. Conclusion: This was the first study to use the TFA framework to assess the acceptability of an app that uses critical situations and solutions (‘if-then plans’) to help reduce sedentary behaviour for people with psychosis. In this sample (male, English speaking mainly white people), participants understood the benefits of being more active. However, reducing sedentary-behaviour is not the main priority of this population and being sedentary has benefits when their mental-health is bad.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Bailey & Y Kiera Bartlett & Lamiece Hassan & Christopher J Armitage & Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell & Matthew Machin & Shon Lewis & Tracy Epton, 2022. "Acceptability of reducing sedentariness using a mobile-phone application based on ‘if then’ plans for people with psychosis: A focus-group study conducted in North West England, UK," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(5), pages 1100-1107, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:1100-1107
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640221102733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640221102733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640221102733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:1100-1107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.