IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i5p1071-1077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the social networks of service users with long term mental health needs living in community with those in a general adult in-patient unit

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Rusca
  • Ike-Foster Onwuchekwa
  • Catherine Kinane
  • Douglas MacInnes

Abstract

Background: Relationships are vital to recovery however, there is uncertainty whether users have different types of social networks in different mental health settings and how these networks may impact on users’ wellbeing. Aims: To compare the social networks of people with long-term mental illness in the community with those of people in a general adult in-patient unit. Method: A sample of general adult in-patients with enduring mental health problems, aged between 18 and 65, was compared with a similar sample attending a general adult psychiatric clinic. A cross-sectional survey collected demographic data and information about participants’ social networks. Participants also completed the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale to examine well-being and the Significant Others Scale to explore their social network support. Results: The study recruited 53 participants (25 living in the community and 28 current in-patients) with 339 named as important members of their social networks. Both groups recorded low numbers in their social networks though the community sample had a significantly greater number of social contacts (7.4 vs. 5.4), more monthly contacts with members of their network and significantly higher levels of social media use. The in-patient group reported greater levels of emotional and practical support from their network. Conclusions: People with serious and enduring mental health problems living in the community had a significantly greater number of people in their social network than those who were in-patients while the in-patient group reported greater levels of emotional and practical support from their network. Recommendations for future work have been made.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Rusca & Ike-Foster Onwuchekwa & Catherine Kinane & Douglas MacInnes, 2022. "Comparing the social networks of service users with long term mental health needs living in community with those in a general adult in-patient unit," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(5), pages 1071-1077, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:1071-1077
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640211017590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640211017590
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640211017590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Network; ego; alter;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:1071-1077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.