Author
Listed:
- Zac E Seidler
- Michael J Wilson
- Simon M Rice
- David Kealy
- John L Oliffe
- John S Ogrodniczuk
Abstract
Background: In an age of increasing loneliness and associated poor mental health, research uncovering the extent to which social connection can be achieved digitally is paramount. This is particularly important among men, who experience unique barriers to achieving meaningful social connections due to masculine norms including independence and self-reliance. Loneliness is a known determinant of both psychological distress and greater time on social media, however relationships among these constructs are yet to be studied specifically among men. Aims: This study aimed to examine a novel mediation model to uncover whether time on social media mediates the association between loneliness and psychological distress, alongside a moderating effect of age. Method: A community sample of 979 men of mean age 36.0 years (range = 18–78, SD  = 13.11) took part via an online survey involving measures of study constructs. Results: Results highlighted a novel moderated mediation effect: for younger men only, loneliness predicts psychological distress via time spent on social media. Conclusion: Men experiencing loneliness appear to turn to social media in attempt at digital connection, however for younger men in particular, often this fails to ameliorate links between loneliness and psychological distress. Implications for public health messaging, clinical work with men and future interventional studies are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Zac E Seidler & Michael J Wilson & Simon M Rice & David Kealy & John L Oliffe & John S Ogrodniczuk, 2022.
"Virtual connection, real support? A study of loneliness, time on social media and psychological distress among men,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(2), pages 288-293, March.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:2:p:288-293
DOI: 10.1177/0020764020983836
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:2:p:288-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.