IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v64y2018i1p3-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of mental health policies from Commonwealth countries

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh Bhugra
  • Soumitra Pathare
  • Rajlaxmi Joshi
  • Gurvinder Kalra
  • Julio Torales
  • Antonio Ventriglio

Abstract

Background: The burden of disease related to mental disorders across the world is substantial. However, there remains inequality between funding for clinical and research activities between physical illness and mental illness in almost all countries. Aims: One way of reducing this inequality is to ensure that mental health policies reflect this. We were interested in looking at the policies of members of Commonwealth. Method: We decided to survey 52 member countries of the Commonwealth to explore whether mental health policies existed and whether there was equity between physical and mental health services funding. Using World Health Organization (WHO) data sets and other sources when indicated, we looked at the existence and contents of mental health policies. Results: We found that less than half of the countries had a mental health policy. Deinstitutionalization was not seen as a priority in many countries and there was no equity between physical and mental health funding. Although integration between physical and mental health care was recommended in many countries, there was a clear gap. Conclusion: It is apparent that there is still a long way to go in terms of equity between physical and mental health in terms of funding in member states of the Commonwealth. These findings confirm earlier observations of discrimination against people with mental illness. We suggest that there must be mechanisms in place to facilitate and support change wherever required.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh Bhugra & Soumitra Pathare & Rajlaxmi Joshi & Gurvinder Kalra & Julio Torales & Antonio Ventriglio, 2018. "A review of mental health policies from Commonwealth countries," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(1), pages 3-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:1:p:3-8
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764017745108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764017745108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764017745108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:1:p:3-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.