Author
Listed:
- Kim Setkowski
- Louk FM van der Post
- Jaap Peen
- Jack JM Dekker
Abstract
Objective: Given increasing numbers of compulsory admissions, it is important to assess patient risk profiles and identify factors that are appropriate for intervention. Methods: A sample of 116 patients who were compulsorily admitted was studied. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Patients were interviewed twice using the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale and the Birchwood Insight Scale. Changes in insight and satisfaction during 2 years were linked to the incidence of involuntary re-admissions in the next three follow-up years. Results: A higher mean score for patient satisfaction was found (mean=3.77, standard deviation ( SD )=0.56; p ⩽.001) in the second interview than in the baseline interview (mean=3.26, SD =0.65). There was also an improvement in insight (in the second interview: mean=7.22, SD =2.86 and in the baseline interview: mean=6.34, SD =3.18; p =.027). There was an inverse correlation between increasing satisfaction (in years 1–2) and the incidence of involuntary admission in years 3–5 (odds ratio (OR)=0.445, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.252–0.793; p =.006). This association proved to be dependent on a history of involuntary admission. Conclusion: Increasing patient satisfaction in the first 2 years was associated with a lower risk of compulsory re-admission in the subsequent follow-up period, but this association proved to be dependent on a history of involuntary admissions in these first two follow-up years. Increase in insight during the same period did not show any effect whatsoever.
Suggested Citation
Kim Setkowski & Louk FM van der Post & Jaap Peen & Jack JM Dekker, 2016.
"Changing patient perspectives after compulsory admission and the risk of re-admission during 5 years of follow-up: The Amsterdam Study of Acute Psychiatry IX,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(6), pages 578-588, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:6:p:578-588
DOI: 10.1177/0020764016655182
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:6:p:578-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.