IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i8p729-734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication of a schizophrenia diagnosis: A qualitative study of patients’ perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Carmel Loughland
  • Kylie Cheng
  • Gillian Harris
  • Brian Kelly
  • Martin Cohen
  • Harsimrat Sandhu
  • Marina Varmos
  • Tomer T Levin
  • Carma Bylund
  • Yulia Landa
  • Sue Outram

Abstract

Background: Transparent diagnostic communication is considered best practice for clinicians. However, while patients expect to receive a schizophrenia diagnosis from their psychiatrist, research suggests mental health clinicians are often reluctant to provide this information to patients. Aim: This study examines the perceptions of people with schizophrenia surrounding the communication of this diagnosis. Methods: A generic qualitative methodological approach was used. A total of 14 patients with schizophrenia were recruited through community mental health services ( n  = 10) and the Australia Schizophrenia Research Bank (ASRB; n  = 4) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the experiences and perceptions of people with schizophrenia about the way a schizophrenia diagnosis was communicated by mental health clinicians. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, codes generated and thematic analysis undertaken aided by NVivo. Results: The majority of participants felt it was beneficial to receive a diagnosis despite acknowledging the distress this information sometimes caused, with many reporting this knowledge gave a sense of relief. It helped to understand their experiences and behaviours, improved their trust in the psychiatric system and increased treatment adherence. However, many reported difficulty in obtaining information about their condition, its treatment and prognosis, and expressed dissatisfaction with the way a diagnosis of schizophrenia was communicated. Discussion: Insight into the perceptions and experiences of patients with schizophrenia about how a diagnosis of schizophrenia is communicated is a key outcome of this research. This knowledge will inform the development of future training programmes for mental health clinicians, and influence the clinical practice of health professionals treating patients with schizophrenia.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmel Loughland & Kylie Cheng & Gillian Harris & Brian Kelly & Martin Cohen & Harsimrat Sandhu & Marina Varmos & Tomer T Levin & Carma Bylund & Yulia Landa & Sue Outram, 2015. "Communication of a schizophrenia diagnosis: A qualitative study of patients’ perspectives," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(8), pages 729-734, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:8:p:729-734
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764015576814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015576814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764015576814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:8:p:729-734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.