IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v59y2013i6p545-554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suicide in the absence of mental disorder? A review of psychological autopsy studies across countries

Author

Listed:
  • Allison Milner
  • Jerneja Sveticic
  • Diego De Leo

Abstract

Background: While numerous past reviews of psychological autopsy (PA) studies have examined the relationship between mental disorder and suicide, there has been little systematic investigation of suicide occurring in the absence of any identifiable psychiatric condition. Aim: This article reviews available literature on the topic by considering Axis I, sub-threshold, mild disorders and personality disorders. Method: We conducted a systematic review of PA studies from 2000 onwards. Studies included in the review had to clearly describe the proportion of suicide cases without a classifiable mental disorder or sub-threshold condition. Results: Up to 66.7% of suicide cases remained without diagnosis in those studies that only examined Axis I disorders ( n = 14). Approximately 37.1% of suicide cases had no psychiatric condition in research papers that assessed personality and Axis I disorders ( n = 9), and 37% of suicides had no Axis I, sub-threshold/mild conditions ( n = 6). In general, areas in China and India had a higher proportion of suicides without a diagnosis than studies based in Europe, North America or Canada. Conclusion: Variation in the proportion of suicide cases without a psychiatric condition may reflect cultural specificities in the conceptualization and diagnosis of mental disorder, as well as methodological and design-related differences between studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Allison Milner & Jerneja Sveticic & Diego De Leo, 2013. "Suicide in the absence of mental disorder? A review of psychological autopsy studies across countries," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(6), pages 545-554, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:6:p:545-554
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764012444259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764012444259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764012444259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:6:p:545-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.