IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v59y2013i5p482-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the relevance of autonomy and relatedness for mental health in healthy and depressed women from two different cultures: When does culture matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Nazli Balkir
  • Elisabeth A Arens
  • Sven Barnow

Abstract

Background: It is well known that the absence of both autonomy and social support (relatedness) are two important etiologic pathways to major depressive disorder (MDD). However, cross-cultural researchers state that the implications of autonomy and relatedness for mental health vary across cultures. Aim: To test these assumptions, the current study investigated the relevance of autonomy and relatedness for mental health in healthy and depressed women from two different cultures (Germans and Turkish immigrants in Germany). Methods: One hundred and eight (108) women were evaluated for their levels of autonomy/relatedness satisfaction, for overall psychopathological complaints including depression, for affectivity and for perceived loneliness through self-report measures. Results: Among healthy groups, relatedness satisfaction predicted better mental health in Turkish women, whereas in German women, autonomy satisfaction was the better mental health predictor. Within depressed groups however, cultural differences in mental health outcomes regarding autonomy were no longer evident. Autonomy was associated with higher levels of mental health in Turkish as well as in German patients. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the relationship between autonomy and mental health is culture-specific in healthy women, but disappears in depressed women. These findings are discussed with consideration of clinical implications and an outlook regarding further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazli Balkir & Elisabeth A Arens & Sven Barnow, 2013. "Exploring the relevance of autonomy and relatedness for mental health in healthy and depressed women from two different cultures: When does culture matter?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(5), pages 482-492, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:5:p:482-492
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764012441428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764012441428
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764012441428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:5:p:482-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.