Author
Listed:
- Giancarlo Lucchetti
- Camilla C Braguetta
- Candido Vallada
- Homero Vallada
Abstract
Background: Spiritual issues are rarely addressed by psychiatric institutions in daily routine practice. Aims: To report the prevalence of, and factors associated with, inpatients’ acceptance of religious assistance in a psychiatric hospital. Methods: All patients evaluated by the religious assistance service in a psychiatric hospital were included. Patients admitted were asked about their need for religious assistance and were assessed on several religious aspects. Additional information was collected from patients’ hospital charts. A comparison between those who accepted the religious assistance and those who did not was performed. Results: Most of the 213 patients evaluated requested religious assistance (85.0%), including those that reported having no religion (79.1%). Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia ( p = .010) and lower intrinsic religiousness ( p = .002) tended to request less religious assistance. More than 80% of patients requested assistance based on religious traditions other than their own. Conclusion: Most psychiatric inpatients were willing to participate in religious assistance sessions, even those without formal religious affiliations. Patients with lower intrinsic religiosity and schizophrenia tended to request less assistance. We believe the findings of this study can serve to foster discussion on whether psychiatric hospitals should provide a structured religious care service.
Suggested Citation
Giancarlo Lucchetti & Camilla C Braguetta & Candido Vallada & Homero Vallada, 2013.
"Exploring the acceptance of religious assistance among patients of a psychiatric hospital,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(4), pages 311-317, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:4:p:311-317
DOI: 10.1177/0020764011433628
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:4:p:311-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.