IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v58y2012i4p400-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Course and outcome of psychosis in black Caribbean populations and other ethnic groups living in the UK: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Chorlton
  • Kwame McKenzie
  • Craig Morgan
  • Gillian Doody

Abstract

Background: A higher incidence of psychosis has repeatedly been reported in black Caribbean populations in the UK. This has been attributed to a number of biological, psychological and sociocultural causes, including black Caribbean populations having a different illness course and outcome compared to other ethnic populations living in the UK. Aims: A systematic review of UK-based quantitative studies, which compared at least two aspects of outcome in black Caribbean populations and other ethnic populations living in the UK, was conducted to assess whether the current body of research suggests that there are differences in the course and outcome of psychoses for these populations. Method: A wide variety of databases were searched using MeSH terms and keywords. Studies were evaluated according to specified inclusion criteria and analysed using predefined scoring criteria. Results: Searches yielded a heterogeneous collection of studies. Large variances in methodological approaches and the quality of studies were reported. Many studies reported little or no difference between black Caribbean and other ethnic populations living in the UK. Conclusions: Emphasis is placed on the unreliability of these findings given the methodological limitations of the studies, and the need for higher-quality research in this area is highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Chorlton & Kwame McKenzie & Craig Morgan & Gillian Doody, 2012. "Course and outcome of psychosis in black Caribbean populations and other ethnic groups living in the UK: A systematic review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(4), pages 400-408, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:4:p:400-408
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764011403070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764011403070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764011403070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:4:p:400-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.