IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v53y2007i6p485-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quantification of Violence Scale: a Simple Method of Recording Significant Violence

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Tyrer

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London, p.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk)

  • Sylvia Cooper

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Elizabeth Herbert

    (Imperial College Medical School, Exhibition Road, London)

  • Conor Duggan

    (Department of Forensic Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham)

  • Mike Crawford

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Eileen Joyce

    (Institute of Neurology, University College London, Box 19, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London)

  • Deborah Rutter

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Helen Seivewright

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Sandra O'Sullivan

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Bharti Rao

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Domenic Cicchetti

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

  • Tony Maden

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London)

Abstract

Background: Although there are many rating scales recording the incidence and intensity of violence there are none that are specifically concerned with the measurement and assessment of severe violence. Aims: To develop a scale sensitive to variation centred on severe violence, establish its normative values, test its feasibility, and assess its reliability and validity in different populations. Method: The Quantification of Violence Scale (QOVS) was developed in two stages. First, a list of 30 commonly eXperienced violent episodes in clinical psychiatric practice were evaluated and tested by weighting each episode by severity. Second, a numerical scale used to record the severity of the episode according to its degree of planning, intent and consequences. Violent episodes in two clinical populations were compared using the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) and the preliminary version of the QOVS over periods up to 18 months, following which the numerical scale was developed. Results: Good (0.60—0.74) to EXcellent (> 0.75) test—retest and inter-rater reliability agreement was obtained with both forms of the scale (intra-class correlations of 0.75 and 0.69 respectively), and similar agreement with MOAS scores was reached (0.67) in clinical populations. The scale was quick and easy to use in practice, and a score defining severe violence (9 on the numerical scale and 16 on the matched scale) was determined. Conclusions: The QOVS, in its two forms, is a useful measure of recording significant violence in clinical and forensic practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Tyrer & Sylvia Cooper & Elizabeth Herbert & Conor Duggan & Mike Crawford & Eileen Joyce & Deborah Rutter & Helen Seivewright & Sandra O'Sullivan & Bharti Rao & Domenic Cicchetti & Tony Maden, 2007. "The Quantification of Violence Scale: a Simple Method of Recording Significant Violence," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 53(6), pages 485-497, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:6:p:485-497
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764007083870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764007083870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764007083870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:6:p:485-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.