IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v50y2004i2p115-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Therapeutic Relationship in the Treatment of Severe Mental Illness: A Review of Methods and Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemarie McCabe

    (Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK.r.mccabe@qmul.ac.uk)

  • Stefan Priebe

    (Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, UK.)

Abstract

Aims: To review the methods and findings from studies of the therapeutic relationship (TR) in the treatment of severe mental illness. Method: A literature search was conducted to identify all studies that used an operationalised measurement of the TR in the treatment of severe mental illness. Results: Fifteen scales–the majority of which were developed for psychotherapy–and the expressed emotion index have been used. Most scales have acceptable internal, inter-rater and test–retest reliability. As none of the scales has been used in more than five studies, no single scale is widely established in psychiatric research. A more positive relationship consistently predicts a better short-and long-term outcome. It appears that a large global factor accounts for the greatest proportion of the variance in the therapeutic relationship. Conclusions: The therapeutic relationship is a reliable predictor of patient outcome in mainstream psychiatric care. Valid assessments may need to take account of different, specific aspects of the relationship in psychiatric settings such as greater heterogeneity of treatment components and goals, increased variability of setting and the statutory responsibility of the clinician. Methodological progress may require conceptual work to ensure valid assessments of this central element of treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemarie McCabe & Stefan Priebe, 2004. "The Therapeutic Relationship in the Treatment of Severe Mental Illness: A Review of Methods and Findings," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(2), pages 115-128, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:115-128
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764004040959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764004040959
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764004040959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosemarie McCabe & Ute-Ulrike Röder-Wanner & Karin Hoffmann & Stefan Priebe, 1999. "Therapeutic Relationships and Quality of Life: Association of Two Subjective Constructs in Schizophrenia Patients," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 45(4), pages 276-283, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Hjorth & Clara Reece Medici & Anette Juel & Nikolaj Juul Madsen & Kirsten Vandborg & Povl Munk-Jørgensen, 2017. "Improving quality of life and physical health in patients with schizophrenia: A 30-month program carried out in a real-life setting," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(4), pages 287-296, June.
    2. Frank Holloway, 1999. "Special Edition: Quality of Life and Mental Health Services," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 45(4), pages 235-237, December.
    3. Clara R Medici & Claus H Vestergaard & Peter Hjorth & Mette V Hansen & Jan WD Shanmuganathan & Anne G Viuff & Povl Munk-Jørgensen, 2016. "Quality of life and clinical characteristics in a nonselected sample of patients with schizophrenia," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(1), pages 12-20, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:115-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.