IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v25y1979i1p1-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Fair Is the Culture I.Q. Test?

Author

Listed:
  • John F. Ireland

    (University of Arizona)

  • Marvin W. Kahn

    (University of Arizona)

Abstract

If a measure of intelligence is culturally biased it is assumed that disadvantaged individuals will score lower on it than on a less biased instrument. The Cattell purports to be 'culture fair' and it was compared to the WISC with a delinquent juvenile population, controlling for both order effects and individual administration. The results reveal consistently lower mean I.Q. scores for the Cattell under all conditions. The Cattell appears to be a more difficult test for this population. It is concluded that considerable caution should be exercised in using the Cattell as a culture fair method of I.Q,. evaluation with underprivileged delinquent youth.

Suggested Citation

  • John F. Ireland & Marvin W. Kahn, 1979. "How Fair Is the Culture I.Q. Test?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 25(1), pages 1-3, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:25:y:1979:i:1:p:1-3
    DOI: 10.1177/002076407902500101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076407902500101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076407902500101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:25:y:1979:i:1:p:1-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.